Here is a very interesting report on energy. The problem of the world now is energy. The demand for oil, fossil fuel, is outstripping supply and exploration activities.
There simply will be no more energy in the next century. Experts predict that North Sea Oil fields will be producing only 30% of what it produces now. The high oil prices simply reflect this situation.
If this report is true, this is something to be happy about especially for Americans. But China will surely buy into this energy source, and the world will again be thirsty for oil.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Energy and Capital <eac-eletter@angelnexus.com>
Date: Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:53 AM
Subject: It's a Win-Win for Natural Gas Investors
![]()
From: Energy and Capital <eac-eletter@angelnexus.com>
Date: Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:53 AM
Subject: It's a Win-Win for Natural Gas Investors
It's a Win-Win for Natural Gas Investors
By Keith Kohl | Thursday, May 17th, 2012
If you haven't noticed by now, true energy independence is at the end of a long and winding road of broken promises and wordy speeches.
We know the song and dance all too well.
It begins with a few notes about eliminating U.S. dependence on foreign oil entirely, followed by a two-step over renewables alleviating a very serious decades-long addiction to crude.
It's been done eight times since Nixon took the oath of office in 1969 — and with every repeat performance, we nod our heads and clap along.
It should be noted that the presidential dedication to energy independence doesn't come without a bit of humor...
The 32 solar panels that Carter installed on the White House were promptly taken down as soon as Reagan took a seat in the Oval Office. In fact, it was one of his first executive decisions.
So where are we today, 36 years into listening to the same broken record?
It appears the next 25 won't be much different:
Advertisement
Profit from the Greatest Markup in History
Over the next ten years, up to 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas will flow from Canadian shores to an energy-starved China for a record profit.
The deal — agreed to in November — hands one small group of companies (and smart shareholders) payments four times larger than what any domestic energy company could ever get away with charging.
The full story — and details about how you could take advantage of it today — are all right here in your free report.
So what's the solution to our energy independence that the last eight U.S. leaders have missed?
It's so simple, it's complicated: access to cheap energy.
Granted, our move away from oil won't happen overnight (and I wouldn't pay much heed to anyone saying it will)... but it will happen.
Over the last year, investors have been successful banking on future LNG exports.
U.S. LNG is the bandwagon everyone's jumping on — and the same place they could end up getting burned.
So far, our Commander in Chief has been supportive of LNG exporting projects.
(Were you expecting anything different during an election year?)
I, for one, am not expecting our future flood of shale gas to hit foreign shores just yet.
The uproar we talked about last week still hasn't been felt.
Here's the catch: Obama doesn't have to openly oppose it.
Because buried deep in the government's archives is a particular piece of legislation that's been tucked away for decades...
The Export Administration Act of 1969 effectively gave the president the authority to limit or suspend exports of U.S. commodities (among other things) in the interest of national security, short supply, and foreign policy.
I can think of a few individuals who consider our domestic energy supplies — specifically, our cheap natural gas — an interest to national security.
Right now, natural gas costs roughly the same as a $15 barrel of oil.
A best-case scenario wouldn't collapse current oil prices that low.
When the first shipments of LNG depart from Gulf Coast facilities, the inevitable outcome would be rising domestic natural gas prices.
When that happens, how long until political pressure reaches a boiling point for the current president?
More importantly, is there a way for us to properly prepare for the upcoming shift to natural gas?
On the one hand, low prices have been crushing North American gas producers; on the other, future LNG exports could be nipped in the bud by pushing the right political buttons.
Advertisement
Here's What Wall Street is so ANGRY About
Wall Street money managers get rich off the fees they charge individual investors for stock recommendations that may — or may not — perform well.
No wonder they're not happy that I'm offering top-notch investment research and stock recommendations... stocks that can jump 213%, 426%, even 610%... for just $5 a month.
That's right: For a limited time, I'm offering $20,816 worth of top-rated investment research and stock recommendations for just $5 a month.
But you'll need to act quickly... The details are right here.
Prepare Your Portfolio for the Flood
There's a better way to invest in natural gas — and it isn't from potential exporters whose shipments could be cut with the snap of presidential fingers.
Just as we saw in the early days of the U.S. petroleum industry, the real investment potential lies with infrastructure.
According to EIA data, there are more than 210 natural gas pipeline systems and over 300,000 miles of transmission pipelines across the United States:
Though we've covered several of these infrastructure plays recently, the real money here is in supplanting oil's domination in the transportation sector.
When millionaires are filling up their trucks for $1 a gallon, it's a no-brainer to hop aboard.
That's the direction we're headed. This is how you can prepare for it.
Until next time,Keith Kohl
A true insider in the energy markets, Keith is one of few financial reporters to have visited the Alberta oil sands. His research has helped thousands of investors capitalize from the rapidly changing face of energy. Keith connects with hundreds of thousands of readers as the Managing Editor of Energy & Capital as well as Investment Director of Angel Publishing's Energy Investor. For years, Keith has been providing in-depth coverage of the Bakken, the Haynesville Shale, and the Marcellus natural gas formations — all ahead of the mainstream media. For more on Keith, go to his editor's page.
Follow Energy and Capital on
The Bottom Line
| |
This email was sent to jorgeus.george@gmail.com . You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy here.
Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2012, Angel Publishing LLC, 1012 Morton St, Baltimore, MD 21201. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. | |
No comments:
Post a Comment